From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <c892a0b1c9b2930ba1536e320db23c6f@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] how to avoid a memset() optimization
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:21:48 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 23e8d568-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>   That's a very interesting remark, since I've always wondered why don't
>   you use waserror()/nexterror() in the rest of the Plan9 source tree
>   as a regular error handling mechanism.

But they still control the compilers for Plan 9 non-kernel code.
In fact, I'm using the same kind of stuff for error handling in
several programs.