From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing From: C H Forsyth Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:51:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: e409b718-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > If you download a fuse distribution and look in > kernel/fuse_kernel.h you can see the messages. which i did, to do a limbo version. then i found that as i expected, they'd screwed up the exchange between kernel and user level so that the same component didn't work even between 64-bit and 32-bit environments on the same host, let alone between hosts. ``right everybody, change protocols!'' then i found that they couldn't get the interrupt stuff working properly, so they ifdef'd it out and hacked it. then i found ... after a time, one gets tired of reading badly-worked out implementations of badly-thought out ideas. i don't care who was first. the question is: what is right? they should have done a little `research' first, before jumping in there, ``first one to the keyboard wins!''