From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: From: C H Forsyth To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] venti ports and productization In-Reply-To: <20031021172051.527.qmail@f.bio.cse.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-yxujfloeeudihvpiuuowymdmtw" Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:30:48 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7688fa68-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-yxujfloeeudihvpiuuowymdmtw Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit that's obviously why microsoft is a complete failure! --upas-yxujfloeeudihvpiuuowymdmtw Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from punt-3.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@vitanuova.com id 1AC0Dn-00075x-6e; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:23:03 +0000 Received: from [130.203.4.6] (helo=mail.cse.psu.edu) by punt-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp id 1AC0Dn-00075x-6e; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 17:23:03 +0000 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id A147119A81; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.18.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4047819A84; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:22:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 62450199F6; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:21:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from galapagos.cse.psu.edu (galapagos.cse.psu.edu [130.203.12.17]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with SMTP id BE59219A65 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:20:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 10442 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 17:20:51 -0000 Received: from roke.cse.psu.edu (HELO bio.cse.psu.edu) (130.203.12.14) by galapagos.cse.psu.edu with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 17:20:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 528 invoked by uid 991); 21 Oct 2003 17:20:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20031021172051.527.qmail@f.bio.cse.psu.edu> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] venti ports and productization In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to a@9srv.net message dated "Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:35:24 -0400." From: Scott Schwartz Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:20:50 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) | the current implementation is at issue? and (the big question) | is it expected that the new stuff will be protocol compatable? That is the big question. Independent but compatable implementations is a sign of success. --upas-yxujfloeeudihvpiuuowymdmtw--