Re: [9fans] any success with current plan9port on sunos5.8?

[Bengt Kleberg <bengt.kleberg@ericsson.com>]

Richard C Bilson wrote:
...deleted
> I don't know if there's a good reason for requiring __EXTENSIONS__
> to be defined, but it didn't break anything that I can see and
> it made the yield problem go away.

on my plan9port (plan9-20040517.tar.gz)  __EXTENSIONS__ is neccessary to 
compile plan9/src/cmd/9term/SunOS.c . however, i think it is better to 
defined it just for that file. obvious diff included below.

i would like to thank you for the diff to u.h. i also experimented with 
removing __EXTENSIONS__ to get rid of sun-os yield(). however, since i 
failed to remove the 3 #undef _NEED* after <sys/types.h> very little 
compiled properly.
i reinstated __EXTENSIONS__, and after that i slowly got myself totally 
lost in various attempts to get replace yield() with p9yield(). you 
saved me. with your change to u.h (and my change to 9term/SunOS.c) 
everything seems to both compile and run. no changes neccessary to 
fdwait.c, sched.c nor thread.h.


bengt

*** /home/eleberg/private/plan9/src/cmd/9term/SunOS.c.original	Tue Jun 
15 08:42:44 2004
--- /home/eleberg/private/plan9/src/cmd/9term/SunOS.c	Tue Jun 15 
08:42:46 2004
***************
*** 1,4 ****
--- 1,5 ----
   #include <u.h>
+ #define	__EXTENSIONS__
   #include <termios.h>
   #include <stropts.h>
   #include <libc.h>