From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Woes of New Language Support
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:24:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb439db93d19576d2e67186abd96aff2@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090726141201.GA2416@polynum.com>
On Sun Jul 26 10:14:51 EDT 2009, tlaronde@polynum.com wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:48:23AM -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > my opinion (not that i'm entitled to one here) is
> > that the unicode guys screwed up. unicode is not
> > consistant. explain why there are two code points sigma.
> > 03c3 greek small letter sigma
> > 03c2 greek small letter final sigma
>
> They are distinct in ancient greek at least. The glyph is not the same
> whether the letter is inside or at the end of a word. (At the beginning,
> in ancient greek, there was indeed no blanks between words but just a
> stream of chars...)
>
> Or perhaps did I misunderstand what you wrote.
yes they are.
but we're arguing in the odd, odd world of codepoints. code points
quite pointedly have no cannonical glyph. this is why unicode often
does not distinguish final forms and other ligatures.
it bothers me that the exception seems to be for western languages.
all the glyphs that one needs for most western languages are already
there. such strange ligatures as there are like ffl are just not important
enough to bother with (u+fb03 for those following along at home).
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-26 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-26 1:55 akumar
2009-07-26 5:08 ` erik quanstrom
2009-07-26 7:41 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-07-26 14:32 ` erik quanstrom
2009-07-28 10:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2009-07-28 14:11 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-07-28 14:52 ` John Floren
2009-07-28 17:46 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-07-26 9:04 ` Salman Aljammaz
2009-07-26 13:48 ` erik quanstrom
2009-07-26 14:12 ` tlaronde
2009-07-26 14:24 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2009-07-26 17:56 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-07-26 18:39 ` Jack Johnson
2009-07-27 0:28 ` erik quanstrom
2009-07-26 11:43 Akshat Kumar
2009-07-26 12:01 Akshat Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb439db93d19576d2e67186abd96aff2@quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).