From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  3 Feb 2011 13:11:07 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cb904730770de786dcadccc3b46c2587@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110203174129.C984D5B91@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <2c752317a96b7b8b980ad37e92ff6f01@terzarima.net>
	<20110203021608.006575B67@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<2c48b8397b29ededd862efa6de0baf70@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<AANLkTikNGX8mK6tLzoSCBj-k0ZVrgNiAHSB4O_aCc5Bj@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110203174129.C984D5B91@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Modern development language for Plan 9,
	WAS: Re: RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely
Topicbox-Message-UUID: aaff21d2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I agree with their goal but not its execution.  I think a
> toolkit for manipulating graph based program representations
> to build optimizing compilers is a great idea but did they
> do it in C++?

are you sure that the problem isn't the graph representation?
gcc also takes a graph-based approach.

abstraction isn't free.

- erik