From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:32:50 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cb96bf9b1b1a582890957292084aee3b@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <624c80ff7358e5c089a8eae7961b4664@swcp.com>
References: <2bca08f7e5b22db500c54deb4b58bc0c@swcp.com>
	<b3ff81f04ee52820237c23ead451c137@kw.quanstro.net>
	<51a0fc4b4bb26e2894cc078f681b2bd2@swcp.com>
	<AANLkTilZ9km4bgC92xS0VvfsbUw993u2zJoIu2CFVkj5@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimwsvV52P3zBmE2tRRZmxiDo-BV9tZkHyzq-pnO@mail.gmail.com>
	<624c80ff7358e5c089a8eae7961b4664@swcp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] naming conventions
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3365950c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I can run "9 9term", but what happens when you run something like "9vx -u
> glenda -r /some/very/long/path/" and then run "!9vx" the next time to rerun
> the last command starting with ?  It probably runs the 9'th command in the
> history.  Sorry I was not clear.  I consider this a minor his is a minor
> nit, the real problem is the journal editors and assumptions of the search
> engines.

the rc history mechanism doesn't suffer from this.  it's
a simple patch to and uses an external program "-p"
and an rc function "-".

essentially, i ripped off byron's rip off of v10 "=".

- erik