From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:35:20 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cbba16d79053cc9117b6859f2373235f@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <e28d7aa800bff3aba9feb3cdc96c2819@sp.inri.net>
References: <e28d7aa800bff3aba9feb3cdc96c2819@sp.inri.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc behavior with rfork
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f5b45fe-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed May 16 10:33:50 EDT 2012, sl@9front.org wrote:
> The confusing part to me is why >[2] or >[3] or >[4]
> (and so on) captures the stdout of the @{} block.
>

yes, it is confusing.  but that's how rc rolls.

- erik