From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 13:58:03 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20110810220404.D6021B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <3257bf7eda3d7965220be7315b21cb86@coraid.com> <7d25ae781f59985f949b025bbc0324bb@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [9fans] simple venti demo: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0f76b9ea-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Aug 11 13:38:25 EDT 2011, rminnich@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:28 AM, erik quanstrom > wrote: >  this is the same > > dillema any non content-addressed disk has.  performance > > vs. safety.  and of course one size doesn't fit all, so there are knobs in > > most disks to turn off write caching. > > it's not as obvious a tradeoff as it seems. are you alluding to the fact that the client has no way of doing a synchronize cache with the venti disk? - erik