From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:07:10 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cbe5ee3248a5ac434590c00715df7cc8@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b181002152057p7128c56fre09bee50d96e28ae@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a560a5d01002140321m2ac0d450j24f01bf2b687c0a7@mail.gmail.com>
	<d30c4b37419cb571b82650b8e88078b3@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<a560a5d01002141109k23fc42bejcce7da435324fffb@mail.gmail.com>
	<f0d9febd9a8110c36e53888c9b134ba5@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<dd6fe68a1002151939k75885facne37723d3b2e82f31@mail.gmail.com>
	<d61fa6d629c248005f42dfaccf02dd51@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<14ec7b181002152057p7128c56fre09bee50d96e28ae@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] problem using a vera font in rio
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d45da4d2-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Myself, I'm stuck with Monaco. Anti-aliased in the editor, aliased in
> a terminal.

at least that's better than a monacle.

it seems that you can have any two of the following
1.  free
2.  reasonable unicode coverage
3.  decent looking.
4.  doesn't need antialiasing.

(yes there are four.)

- erik