From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:50:18 -0500 To: charles.forsyth@gmail.com, 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <2dce475f96630e9cf6e633e2f74a2ffc@coraid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 6a bug Topicbox-Message-UUID: 410d815a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Nov 16 17:36:39 EST 2011, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote: > AX is the wrong register. REGARG is BP. actually, it's "RARG" in 6a, in case it > changes, although that seems less likely now. > well my example is slightly booged then. i just needed a label. the point still stands that 6l is not liking the *value*. this actually comes from _start64v, and i wanted to simplify it. if you replace the given value with $10, it 6l will not complain. _start64v: doasm: notfound from=75 to=10 (423) ADDQ $-1099511627776,AX _start64v: doasm: notfound from=75 to=10 (423) ADDQ $-1099511627776,AX _start64v: doasm: notfound from=75 to=10 (423) ADDQ $-1099511627776,AX - erik