From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9atom vs 9front
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:38:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd82ded6b78a6f13ebf4e264a6f81653@kw.quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XNRSUhB90nxNrbehi7gwqxCte+GmRAv=QV4UZ5wQNYJMA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu Mar 14 09:06:51 EDT 2013, 23hiro@gmail.com wrote:
> the difference about 9front is that it also works on real hardware, so
> you don't need to mess with these VMs.
i think you misspelled "similarity".
i'm sure you can point to some instances of hardware not working
in plan 9 and working in 9front. that's fine. but if i understand
correctly, 9front has taken the decision to not send in patches.
that's totally fine in my book. but it seems a little less than helpful
to not send patches and then criticize.
- erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-11 16:22 Kyle Laracey
2013-03-11 16:36 ` erik quanstrom
2013-03-14 11:43 ` Kyle Laracey
2013-03-11 17:30 ` Richard Miller
2013-03-11 19:50 ` David du Colombier
2013-03-11 20:34 ` balaji
2013-03-11 20:36 ` Bakul Shah
2013-03-11 20:47 ` Matthew Veety
2013-03-11 20:56 ` Bakul Shah
2013-03-12 1:49 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2013-03-12 20:53 ` a
2013-03-12 20:55 ` erik quanstrom
2013-03-12 21:18 ` a
2013-03-14 11:43 ` Kyle Laracey
2013-03-14 13:05 ` hiro
2013-03-14 13:38 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2013-03-14 13:49 ` Kurt H Maier
2013-03-14 15:58 ` [9fans] 9front Acme unresponsive to key presses Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
2013-03-14 16:41 ` [9fans] 9atom vs 9front Bakul Shah
2013-03-14 11:43 ` Kyle Laracey
2013-03-14 11:43 ` Kyle Laracey
2013-03-14 16:08 ` Matthew Veety
2013-03-14 19:46 ` Bakul Shah
2013-03-14 11:48 ` Kyle Laracey
2013-03-11 16:32 Kyle Laracey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd82ded6b78a6f13ebf4e264a6f81653@kw.quanstro.net \
--to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).