From: Karl Magdsick <kmagnum@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 on qemu
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 23:03:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd8ecdef0412252103579116f9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a763a7b17095ddd91f309ff9f5b106a2@orthanc.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Also, QEMU allows x86 OSes to run on non-x86 hardware while Xen does not.
Are the non-x86 Plan9 versions still being actively maintained?
-Karl
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 15:26:46 +0900, YAMANASHI Takeshi <9.nashi@gmail.com> wrote:
> my humble comparisons between Xen and qemu are:
> - Xen shows a better performance.
> - qemu doesn't need special privilege to install/use.
> but Xen needs to be installed before any other OSes.
> - Xen requires guest OSes to be ported to Xen while qemu doesn't.
> - qemu has a vga device supported by aux/vga while Xen doesn't (yet)
>
> > Xen for servers and qemu for terminal even Windows?
>
> p9 terminal running under qemu would be
> an easy way to get around vga hell for free.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-26 5:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-24 6:26 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2004-12-25 18:34 ` YAMANASHI Takeshi
2004-12-25 22:52 ` YAMANASHI Takeshi
2004-12-26 5:03 ` Karl Magdsick [this message]
2004-12-26 17:09 ` Russ Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-24 6:26 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2004-12-24 6:43 ` Bruce Ellis
2004-12-24 6:55 ` Russ Cox
2004-12-24 13:02 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-12-24 17:23 ` Jack Johnson
2004-12-27 9:34 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-12-25 18:14 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-12-25 19:38 ` Tiit Lankots
2004-12-24 5:23 YAMANASHI Takeshi
2004-12-24 5:41 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-24 5:47 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-24 23:20 ` jmk
2004-12-25 19:02 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-25 19:13 ` jmk
2004-12-25 20:03 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-25 20:51 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-25 21:07 ` jmk
2004-12-25 23:08 ` Kenji Okamoto
2004-12-23 23:08 Russ Cox
2004-12-24 3:52 ` Jack Johnson
2004-12-24 4:25 ` jmk
2004-12-25 18:58 ` jmk
2004-12-25 19:49 ` jmk
2004-12-24 5:54 ` Tim Newsham
2004-12-25 18:32 ` Tim Newsham
2004-12-25 20:09 ` Tim Newsham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd8ecdef0412252103579116f9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kmagnum@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).