From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <cd8ecdef0509300914v594bf030i7bc57774defe3120@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:14:11 -0400
From: Karl Magdsick <kmagnum@gmail.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model.
In-Reply-To: <45544405a9a74e554cd5b645a672fb3e@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <cd8ecdef0509300844x6e2ae08csbe97ede3b2cff972@mail.gmail.com>
	<45544405a9a74e554cd5b645a672fb3e@terzarima.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 926fb43e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Cool.

Are there also equivalents of int_lest32_t, uint_fast16_t, float_t,
double_t, etc?


-Karl

On 9/30/05, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> plan 9 code has u32int, u64int etc
> which is still rather ugly but easier to speak
> without stammering, and is mainly confined to
> code that requires particular widths.
> the integer type big enough to hold a pointer is uintptr.
>