From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 23:14:20 -0700
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cdf28091b8147cd4e6608c143ecac78b@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <d6ae2485b0a77c30504133351ee5cbeb@9netics.com>
References: <d6ae2485b0a77c30504133351ee5cbeb@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Namespace inheritance between processes
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 936166b8-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > Also, a totally random question: It seems like poor ergonomics that
> > one must create empty directories in order to serve as mount points.
> > Why not just allow mounting to names that don't exist yet?
>
> mntgen(4)

linux has the same restriction, and no mntgen.  :-)

- erik