From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ce051805a8ec81185ce48c605164a9ef@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 overcommits memory?
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Thu,  6 Sep 2007 21:18:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <13426df10709061238l1e081fel101928310c9db13c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b9ba2f54-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> yes, because exec takes a pathname. that's a pull model. That is

9p can remove your pain