From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <ce3cff6d53d928b9d6387e952542b62c@rei2.9hal>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 17:35:12 +0200
From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <cbba16d79053cc9117b6859f2373235f@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc behavior with rfork
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8f9007bc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

hm, wait... that cant be right:

term% @{echo 1; echo 2 >[1=2]} >[2]/dev/null
1
term% @{echo 1; echo 2 >[1=2]} >/dev/null
2

so this is what i would expect. why is that
broken with rfork e? theres some bug lurking.

--
cinap