From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [9fans] C++ compiler anyone? To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200107311755.NAA15973@augusta.math.psu.edu> From: pac Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 09:30:35 +0200 Topicbox-Message-UUID: d83bf61e-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 >> In article <20010731160942.224A719A04@mail.cse.psu.edu> you write: >> >> does anyone have a functional C++ compiler for Release 3? >> > >> >Functional C++? As though C++ were missing the kitchen >> >sink. Can't you guys just stick with Scheme or ML? >> BTW, is there Scheme, or Lisp, for Plan 9? >> Err, I think that's ``functional'' as in ``working'' not as >> in functional programming. The idea of functional C++ is... >> scary. But there's always ocaml.... Yes, I am just looking for a (working) C++ compiler. Sorry for the word "functional" --> beat my English! >> >> - Dan C. >> >> (ps- has anyone worked on getting HUGS or GHC working under >> Plan 9? Has anyone ever wondered why there's not an FPL called >> Curry?) >> -- Peter A. Cejchan Dept. Paleobiology, Inst. Geology Acad. Sci., Rozvojova 135, Prague 6 CZ-16502 Czech Republic ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A plea: Please, consider your support to the Public Library of Science initiative at http://www.publiclibraryofscience.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~