From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Fri,  3 May 2013 14:38:49 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <cf1d170be05de47b4ef86b5576a25653@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130503183446.GA884@polynum.com>
References: <64e57b5cc889082953a7f022f534b833@quintile.net>
	<20130503162039.GA557@polynum.com>
	<510fc921748adc6e0cd271e0c60d56cb@9srv.net>
	<20130503164804.GA649@polynum.com>
	<CAJd0wvC3gTOdNF9pG7oKNYcpx_Y-yOaqcLzhNjNEiPGhfe+zvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130503175006.GA484@polynum.com>
	<CAEAzY3_9pRiRFuNv_wONkNcZBBYB1ZgsGPAym-+aFaM3_1URkA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130503183446.GA884@polynum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] anyone attempted to build ghostscript recently?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 554a396e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Yes... But this is also why, concurrently, work has to be done to get
> rid of some unnecessities: that documents produced on Plan9 be viewable
> on Plan9 with only Plan9 means (external documents are another problem).

ghostscript already renders plan 9 produced pdf just fine.
so that problem is solved, and there's no need to do anything.

what we need is better access to externally produced documents.

- erik