From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <cfdf5c80f157749d5ee5aae34daa46ec@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:05:40 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <d1c554290908201640x43cc47d1n4773dd11c2e4b593@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] dump9660?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4fabf14e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Aug 20 19:42:04 EDT 2009, iru.muzgo@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Venkatesh Srinivas<me@acm.jhu.edu> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Do any of you still use dump9660? Any recent experiences or stuff I
> > should watch out for using it?
> >
>
> mk9660(8) is the main user, but i don't think she reads the list.

they are effectively quite different.  there are 11 if(mk9660)'s in the
source.

- erik