From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <cfe218816d9a0282163e493777b2a1cb@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p flush
Date: Thu,  9 Mar 2006 19:03:38 +0000
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <f5684a847374515f64425b1adb81bba8@swtch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 10661e28-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> It is more important to get the semantics right than the timing.

that's good.

my particular scenario is that i'm writing a 9p server that is also a
9p client.  if a particular request is flushed, then the process
dealing that request needs to be able to send a flush request down the
client 9p connection, and wait for a reply in order to decide how to
reply to the original flush request.

as far as i understand it, this should be fine.

flush is such fun.