From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d00a9f70ecec5450b3aad09a38058d28@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Fri,  5 Jan 2007 01:18:10 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] python
In-Reply-To: <4f34febc0701042014p7e13c951gc20bd80f44aa44b6@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fd09b5a0-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

perhaps my assembly-language addled brain is just rebelling, but my snark=
y reaction
to this python thread is this:

	eh,  while you're at it, why not just run the whole dynamicly-bound
	bit in a 386-emulator.  that way, when movietunes3000 really wants some
	bit of linux, you can just run it in the emulator.

	or, Just Run Linux=E2=84=A2.

my slightly more thoughtful reaction is, why does the operating system ne=
ed to control
the late-linking process?  (python doesn't really need .so shared librari=
es per se, does it?)
to me this seems more like a linker problem than anything else.  why not =
write your own?
you could write an rc script to gather the bits and waah laa. ... ooh, ro=
n.  i just invented
linker scripts. ;-)

- erik