From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:03:19 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <d07dd7e7d5190bfda4e065a12d8b724c@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACm3i_hY0ZMk6uVZwio8B_dkw9a_tjHjF-vV+J0LTt-x=nV2eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <eb671f2f86aab845d96c2c02a3cd6e8e@hamnavoe.com>
	<CACm3i_hY0ZMk6uVZwio8B_dkw9a_tjHjF-vV+J0LTt-x=nV2eg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] usbether
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bbefa3b2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I had a similar problem with serial a while ago. The problem was that
> it was taking too long doing too many system calls, doing big reads
> and buffering may help you?

why doesn't the device do the buffering?  or is the problem
that usb/ether essentially an event loop of <read packet> <write packet>
and any delays in that pipeline accumulate?

- erik