From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  3 Mar 2014 10:37:49 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <d1139ab47d53df054a5dc9d53fa6c7d5@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <9bd4053538a6d4a8d3b1cea89941d1bc@hamnavoe.com>
References: <9bd4053538a6d4a8d3b1cea89941d1bc@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] usb configuration
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c24dc68e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Or have we completely degenerated into a "my fork is better than
> yours" contest?

i hope we haven't.  but i might be guilty myself.  unfortunately,
so many small, tight bugfixes go unapplied or rejected.  "maybe"
seems to count as rejection.  it's hard to keep up the spirit.

i don't blame anybody.  reviewing patches is hard, and thankless.
and speaking for myself, submitters are sure the world revolves around
their favorite patch.

but imho, plan 9 would be better for more patches being applied.
i'm willing to put my money where my mouth is.

- erik