From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] browse /sys/src From: Kenji Okamoto Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:39:19 +0900 In-Reply-To: <2aab0c267882f16e9ce77d5b9ff0f5a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-fnunhqojglzfklogdamiozomyh" Topicbox-Message-UUID: 357b55e6-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-fnunhqojglzfklogdamiozomyh Content-Disposition: inline Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I forgot one thing. I don't say that the sources should be limited to Lucent alone. However, this issue should be discussed before making decision. Kenji --upas-fnunhqojglzfklogdamiozomyh Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp ([192.168.1.3]) by diabase; Wed Jan 26 13:30:29 JST 2005 Received: from elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.103.2]) by granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id j0Q4YU6w012991 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:34:30 +0900 Received: from intrepid.gw.osakafu-u.ac.jp (intrepid.gw.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.248.13]) by elmo.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.9.3p2+/3.7W-04071317) with ESMTP id NAA19065 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:31:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from washington.gw.osakafu-u.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by intrepid.gw.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0Q4V4i1002179 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:31:04 +0900 (JST) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by washington.gw.osakafu-u.ac.jp (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j0Q4V3sa009782 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:31:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B86EE63E43 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:30:56 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 8C97563E03 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29536-01-67 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:30:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp (granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp [157.16.101.69]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 907FB63DFD for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:30:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <2aab0c267882f16e9ce77d5b9ff0f5a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> To: russcox@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] browse /sys/src From: Kenji Okamoto Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:28:54 +0900 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Cc: X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+okamoto=granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+okamoto=granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp@cse.psu.edu > Lucent insists on the click-through for the official distribution, > but the terms of the Lucent Public License do not require > it of others. (This is in contrast to the Plan 9 License, > which did.) There is at least already one external site > already that makes much of the Plan 9 source available > without a click-through: the plan9port site. I believe, because I haven't got it, plan9port is only a part of Plan9, I mean, by only those we cannot run Plan 9. > I think the web interface to sources that Yamanashi set > up is quite nice. I doubt this. Web can be reached from anyone who wants, even he/she is a terrorist etc, I don't mean the word same as Iqaqi etc. We, academic community is 'open', anyone can get the resources we developed. However, if you want to enter the community, you have to be evaluated before. In this sense, academic community is not completely 'open'. However, we don't believe it's not open. I'd like the Plan 9 community is as such. I don't brame click-through procedure of Lucent, because it's just like the above I mentioned. I still believe moral term. Kenji --upas-fnunhqojglzfklogdamiozomyh--