From: "Iruata Souza" <iru.muzgo@gmail.com>
To: weigelt@metux.de,
"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:19:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d1c554290708100519o5a1d2682n76b00ff00d041757@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070810114225.GF18939@nibiru.local>
On 8/10/07, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> did anyone do any comparisons on 9P vs. FUSE for (mostly-)local uses ?
>
> There're a lot of interesting FUSE-based filesystems out there,
> and programming w/ FUSE seems to be quite easy.
>
> Maybe we could try to get things together ?
>
>
> cu
> --
9p is way simpler.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 11:42 Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 11:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-08-10 12:19 ` Iruata Souza [this message]
[not found] ` <2d66a95ea087868174cfdc519a48a2d7@9netics.com>
2007-08-10 12:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 12:36 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 12:42 ` Lucio De Re
[not found] ` <22bce9d3afa44ed70b739ea77d5d8046@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 12:48 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:18 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <f17c25af999bb93211e069e6109bb154@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 13:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:42 ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-08-10 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 13:45 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 15:51 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 16:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 16:39 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 18:16 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 18:25 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 18:35 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:16 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 21:57 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 19:02 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 19:26 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d1c554290708100519o5a1d2682n76b00ff00d041757@mail.gmail.com \
--to=iru.muzgo@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
--cc=weigelt@metux.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).