From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d1c554290708100519o5a1d2682n76b00ff00d041757@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 09:19:39 -0300
From: "Iruata Souza" <iru.muzgo@gmail.com>
To: weigelt@metux.de,
	"Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
In-Reply-To: <20070810114225.GF18939@nibiru.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070810114225.GF18939@nibiru.local>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a3c8cc1e-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 8/10/07, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
> did anyone do any comparisons on 9P vs. FUSE for (mostly-)local uses ?
>
> There're a lot of interesting FUSE-based filesystems out there,
> and programming w/ FUSE seems to be quite easy.
>
> Maybe we could try to get things together ?
>
>
> cu
> --

9p is way simpler.