From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 18:43:22 -0300 From: "Iruata Souza" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <13426df10803180952w3f0d73c2ga1ffa808ddc44de1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <625ffb369a67f436b007df6ae899ac06@9netics.com> <13426df10803180952w3f0d73c2ga1ffa808ddc44de1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] It looks like our GSoC application was rejected Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7bf074e8-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 1:52 PM, ron minnich wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Iruata Souza wrote: > > > last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the > > effort made by the organization. > > I am going to assume you know this because you know the % of failed > projects for Plan 9, you know the % failed for all other projects, and > you know that all other projects had a lower % failed than Plan 9, and > all these were renewed? Or, better, someone at Google told you? > > Otherwise, if this is idle speculation, we've got the Venti thread for > that one :-) > this is the written down result of my fast introspection. in fact, if you read it again you might note i didn't say anything about gsoc08. iru