From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:00:53 -0300 From: "Iruata Souza" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <1212445966.4280.1097.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <483D8DBE.4090005@cableone.net> <200805282337.11349.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> <20080601151213.GA10795@nibiru.local> <5d375e920806021225w3a98fec0l87ae4499838ae91b@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10806021255y4122f46h34a88ebb8480f29e@mail.gmail.com> <5d375e920806021337m51160c64rf20e0e1f96aca522@mail.gmail.com> <1212445966.4280.1097.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] crosstool fails on gentoo Topicbox-Message-UUID: b2e975c6-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:37 +0200, Uriel wrote: >> *yet another layer of complexity so you can look at all that stuff >> at the same time*. >> > all I care about is that it doesn't leak I don't have any solaris boxes to play now, but I remember when taking a dtrace course - more or less two years ago - that I managed to see the performance of a nice machine go down only by setting all it's tracing points. I know that this could be considered normal if it wasn't for the fact that, with two xterms opened, the one which started dtrace, after a series of ^C, had 'transfered' to it the command-line history of the other xterm. It was a peculiar situation since the instructor was telling us about the non-intrusiveness of the tool. iru