From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d1c554290806140814q3019ffd2xaec299d74f9ec62e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:14:51 -0300
From: "Iruata Souza" <iru.muzgo@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <f@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f378df9ccc1f8665ca7042acf9ea80f8@quanstro.net>
	<20080614012433.7F7D05B46@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<775b8d190806132158w3857c7d8u217fb02b66ff955b@mail.gmail.com>
	<f@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] I/O load crashes Qemu
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c0aa73a4-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 9:53 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
>> I don't know how the praise of "excellent" was bestowed on QEMU. It
>> may work well on a x86 emulating an x86 but try something else. It
>> ends in tears.
>>
>
> this isn't a defense of qemu.  i don't know enough about it
> to defend it.
>
> however, why is it a requirement that a vm be able to emulate
> other machines?
>

because it claims to do so?

iru