From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:25:55 -0200 Message-ID: From: Iruata Souza To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] 8l(1) PUSH/POP Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9757c112-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:09 PM, erik quanstrom wro= te: >> the application is a pbs. for now i'm doing a stack-relative move, but >> i'd rather use a pop. >> disabling the restriction has shown no regressions in the pbs yet. >> >> and i couldn't seem to find the same restriction in vl(1) for example. > > that restriction did save me quite a bit of time recently. > i had forgotten a pop in a place where it would have been > quite disasterous. =C2=A08l kindly reminded me. > > i wouldn't be interested in your patch as the forgotton pop > would seem to be a much more common case. > my naive patch is just 538c538 < diag("unbalanced PUSH/POP"); --- > print("warning: unbalanced PUSH/POP\n");