From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201003291720.32633.corey@bitworthy.net>
References: <138575261003230627kb81c42q7710df1af4283919@mail.gmail.com>
	<201003291358.56753.corey@bitworthy.net>
	<34cb9c5c75eebb8db65b0d7da5b0cbe1@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<201003291720.32633.corey@bitworthy.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:11:57 -0300
Message-ID: <d1c554291003291911w4e2cedg3408cf43ecae0ce2@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iruata Souza <iru.muzgo@gmail.com>
To: corey@bitworthy.net,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan ? (was: native install)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f8397cc8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Corey <corey@bitworthy.net> wrote:
> Is it that the core Plan 9 design concepts[1] are in fact inappropriate or
> uninteresting for anything beyond that which Plan 9 currently provides?
>

[1] /sys/doc