From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d1d29a273734372fdc6a31a3e1caacb5@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <058401c42a4d$5515ffd0$48db7d50@SOMA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 19:38:20 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6ec5d48a-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> i have to disagree.  the ! addressing no different from / [file]
> addressing.  you can synthesise the file tree based on context.

how's the server meant to guess the authentication/firewall
hoops you have to jump through to get access to the remote
server? just naming it is not sufficient.