From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d2a4d7ea9fd9b80e42613b7deba9af14@9srv.net>
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ports performance
In-Reply-To: <20040408T121029Z_FFB700000000@mail2.cu-portland.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu,  8 Apr 2004 15:35:01 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5677bfb0-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

// It's nice and fun to be able to run Plan 9's ls on other
// systems, but really quite useless, when there's already
// an ls on every unix.

as rog already pointed out, plan9's is often better than the
vendor-supplied one. and almost always has a smaller set of
options. and, most importantly, those options are the same
across every platform, as is their output.
=E3=82=A2