From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d32caad36a2bda65672a67fc8064b01e@sdgm.net>
From: boyd@sdgm.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ISP filtering - update
In-Reply-To: <3F7492D1.C25B1060@null.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:33:45 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5518548c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

    Full authentication might  allow you to build an "ignore" list
    when you see you have received a virus from infected hosts, but
    you'll end up with millions of entries in that list, after you
    have flagged millions of pieces of spams.  Not a solution.

yes, i know i want to minimise that.  it has to be a scaleable solution.

    Perhaps trying to solve this problem via technology is much
    like trying to eliminate terrorists by killing mature ones
    rather than indoctrinating potential ones.

cut the heads of their C & C and that will (either) get their attention
or leave them in dissarray;  snipers _always_ kill officers first,
unless the REMFs get in their way or the stupid ROEs.

    I frankly don't think it's going to happen, thus this problem is
    never going to be solved.

i have a 'bad feeling' you're right, but i'm not done with 'em yet.

maybe i am crazy enough to beat 'em ;)