From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d488e1fa95671ee80dfae7771deb7338@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:45:44 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <43545d16f74c51bf0670e34a524059ea@bellsouth.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] VMs, etc.  (was: Re: security questions)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e28d2574-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Absolutly, but part of what has changed over the past 20
> years is that the rate at which this local processing power
> has grown has been faster than rate at which the processing
> power of the rack-mount box in the machine room has
> grown (large clusters not withstanding, that is).  So the
> gap between them has narrowed.

or, we have miserably failed as of late in putting ever cycle we
can dream about to good use; we'd care more about the cycles
of a cpu server if we were better at using them up.

	every cycle's perfect, every cycle's great
	if one cycle's wasted, god gets quite irate

that, plus the fact that the the mhz wars are dead and
gone.

- erik