From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d5611683a8b70c9b9a6cc2c5a8c8f3f9@9srv.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 06:01:21 -0400
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] disk/^(mbr format fdisk prep)
In-Reply-To: <3da71b1c3631431f81d31e9eab88b528@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7b28ff54-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

// Because none sayes about unstability of Ken's fs or kfs,
// but some do for fossil things.

based on my own readings here, i think people say plenty of
bad things about kfs. we just hear them less because kfs was
never billed as something suitable for a file server. it
also seems to me that most of the complaints about fossil
not all) were early on, and that it's stabalized much since.

i wish abbreviating "Ken's FS" didn't yeild "kfs".
=E3=82=A2