From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net From: Lucio De Re Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:08:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1327f5027eaa9481a13e08f02cae8327@proxima.alt.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-jpsrsmycmnqpmpoemirwcgqggi" Subject: Re: [9fans] C compiler error? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4eee1b22-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-jpsrsmycmnqpmpoemirwcgqggi Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Was meant as private mail, sorry! ++L --upas-jpsrsmycmnqpmpoemirwcgqggi Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <9fans-bounces@9fans.net> Received: from mail.9fans.net (mail.9fans.net [67.207.142.3]) by mumble.proxima.alt.za (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBE45h65001619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:05:46 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[67.207.142.3]) by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <9fans-bounces@9fans.net>) id 1Ragot-0000Xf-5A; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:51:55 +0000 Received: from lax-gw18.mailroute.net ([199.89.0.118] helo=mail.mroute.net) by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ragor-0000Xa-4R for 9fans@9fans.net; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:51:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lax-gw18.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A72583ADEB for <9fans@9fans.net>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:04:43 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute X-X-Spam-Flag: NO X-X-Spam-Score: 0 X-X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-X-Spam-Score-Float: -0.3 X-X-Spam-Level: X-X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 tagged_above=-999 tests=[KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP=0.2, KHOP_THREADED=-0.5] autolearn=disabled Received: from mumble.proxima.alt.za (www.chauncey.co.za [192.96.32.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lax-gw18.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9D6583AD90 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 04:04:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxima.alt.za (dsl-144-49-28.telkomadsl.co.za [41.144.49.28]) (authenticated bits=0) by mumble.proxima.alt.za (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pBE44UpZ003226 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:04:31 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <1327f5027eaa9481a13e08f02cae8327@proxima.alt.za> To: rsc@swtch.com, 9fans@9fans.net From: Lucio De Re Organization: Proxima Research & Development Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:05:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mumble.proxima.alt.za [192.96.32.140]); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:05:46 +0200 (SAST) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mumble.proxima.alt.za [192.96.32.140]); Wed, 14 Dec 2011 06:04:31 +0200 (SAST) Subject: Re: [9fans] C compiler error? X-BeenThere: 9fans@9fans.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.9fans.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net Errors-To: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net X-Filter: OK <9fans-bounces@9fans.net> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Charles Forsyth (add a cast) until >> the compilers can be changed to support it. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5485063/ is a step toward it. > it doesn't generate the prettiest code but i think it works. > What is the expected status? Is Anthony's CL to be abandoned in favour of the change to the Plan 9 C compiler (give or take the other nit of a "static" definition)? I don't have a problem with minor unofficial changes to the Plan 9 distribution, but others may object. Lucio. --upas-jpsrsmycmnqpmpoemirwcgqggi--