From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d5ba8bc3b6f32738c297a3d236a1ae0a@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:35:17 -0400
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bay Area Plan 9 Users Group Meeting (August '07)
In-Reply-To: <599f06db0707311931wcaa6c3lce7b99b5ee76fef1@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 995955d2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> either grouping (well-behaved dogs) and interns or well-behaved (dogs
> and interns)
> in a rather ambiguous way. Can we bring bad-behaved interns?.
> 
> The "and" is redundant in the presence of the "et" in the "et cetera",
> unambiguously meaning
> that there is a grouping or class of equivalence being defined.
> Though I am not a native english speaker though, so I might be wrong.
> 
> Back to the assembler...

you'll do better with a language that uses parens to good effect. ;-)

- erik