From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:55:01 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <d5c8f82ac5f6695fa1160ccc3d1664db@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <13426df11003161652k2f30609bod15be880af2ee26@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13426df11003161029v7fb35a3ft51d0e64af29aca72@mail.gmail.com>
	<b66f89840148a69e10defc9987a4a2c1@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<13426df11003161119s285173f0tc4d5004554e1185d@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df11003161604t20c78a8btb4dc38bde0245c4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B6561F9-9D86-4B83-8ABE-13D00DABDABB@gmail.com>
	<13426df11003161652k2f30609bod15be880af2ee26@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting qemu problem
Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb15563e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I tend to disagree. If I'm running qemu it is because I want to
> simulate a whole-machine environment. If I don't need that simulation,
> I'll go back to 9vx.

seems that keeping up with qemu is at least as hard
as keeping up with real hardware.

- erik