From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d637e8f7bf93119cbde686ad1b2f7cf4@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme design
From: Kenji Okamoto <okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
Date: Thu,  3 Jun 2004 17:54:01 +0900
In-Reply-To: <ACCF003CBA3D09458207DB0CB86AD17D06633D@XMAIL.asuch.cas.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 924261c6-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> I think you lost the most important point of acme, that is acme has
>> windows recursively,
>=20
> sorry for ignorance, but can you hint me some more info on this?

The direction which we took for our marsv. =E2=98=BA

By the way, I don't want to make debate here, however, I could
recommend you to forget the acme's way if you want to make
something new user interface for Plan 9.   Acme's way is good
for text things, I know.  If you are thinking of an extension of
acme for text thing, I think it's not so interesting to me.   Acme is
good enough to me.

Kenji