From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d65919ab7cc42eb7943b49f29da3247c@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Mon,  3 Jun 2013 20:15:10 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1a3f7ddc348d943dd2b9e49f49173f80@ladd.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] gmtime() ulong
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 62ab3fb8-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> is that really going to work out?

Somebody must have thought so:

     TIME(2)                                                   TIME(2)

     NAME
          time, nsec - time in seconds and nanoseconds since epoch
...
          Times from time should be stored in and treated as ulongs;
          this extends the range of valid times into the year 2106.