From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 10:19:00 -0400
To: charles.forsyth@gmail.com, lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <d76c4d501abff0ca6da3e12240c997cc@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5ggBBkJYOX_Qa-9Jh+h3D7wcYsmpjWyexFMba46LPvRrQ@mail.gmail.c>
References: <CAOw7k5j5ePe1QYw7nmkXQA8pRhsgEDLUuFus48rUUX6uS9HOVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<826abb8cf0c1ea41e3ebc081df3169c7@proxima.alt.za>
	<CAOw7k5ggBBkJYOX_Qa-9Jh+h3D7wcYsmpjWyexFMba46LPvRrQ@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Acme: the way the future actually was
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b92e0272-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri Sep 14 10:12:24 EDT 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote:

> Probably never heard of Oberon either.

neither is knowledge of oberon ubiquitous among 9fans, who may
not realize that acme itself is a copy.

- erik