9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rog@vitanuova.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Channel casting
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 18:27:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d770e27d2897bc7e3f0638d36f554c27@vitanuova.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3100726675a9ffcb9f2eefc78956dba1@plan9.bell-labs.com>

> For the case you describe, the client typically
> sends a (request, return-channel) pair and
> then recvs from the return channel, which is
> private to that client.

note that if clients adhere correctly to protocol, then it's not
strictly necessary to allocate a new channel each time.

to modify russ's examples:

an echo server:
	srvchan := chan of int;
	srvreplychan := chan of int;
	for(;;){
		n := <-srvchan;
		srvreplychan <-= n;
	}

	echothread(srvchan, replychan: chan of int)
	{
		for(i:=0;; i++){
			srvchan <-= i;
			j := <-replychan;
			sys->print("sent %d, got %d\n", i, j);
		}
	}

	spawn echothread(srvchan, srvreplychan);
	spawn echothread(srvchan, srvreplychan);
	spawn echothread(srvchan, srvreplychan);
	spawn echothread(srvchan, srvreplychan);

since we're using synchronous (unbuffered) channels, and clients
always write, then read, the server is guaranteed to be writing back
to the same client.

sometimes this makes things simpler; other times, sending a reply
channel makes more sense (particularly when the kind of reply might
depend on the particular request).

  cheers,
    rog.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-19 23:15 northern snowfall
2003-05-19 22:24 ` Russ Cox
2003-05-19 22:14   ` Charles Forsyth
2003-05-19 23:29   ` northern snowfall
2003-05-19 22:38     ` Russ Cox
2003-05-19 23:45       ` northern snowfall
2003-05-21 17:27   ` rog [this message]
2003-05-21 17:26     ` Russ Cox
2003-05-21 18:28     ` northern snowfall
2003-05-21 17:33       ` Russ Cox
2003-05-21 18:50       ` rog
2003-05-22  1:09         ` okamoto
2003-05-22  9:46           ` C H Forsyth
2003-05-23  1:07             ` okamoto
2003-05-23 14:10               ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d770e27d2897bc7e3f0638d36f554c27@vitanuova.com \
    --to=rog@vitanuova.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).