From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet vs. godaddy whois
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:04:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7d0d774319d70a675979c95dd7c9948@terzarima.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080416232616.C6EB55B4B@mail.bitblocks.com>
> The transmitting host SHOULD send the first zero-window
> probe when a zero window has existed for the retransmission
> timeout period (see Section 4.2.2.15), and SHOULD increase
> exponentially the interval between successive probes.
that first part requires an action in a given case, to ensure it is done (the
context is given by some preceding text not quoted here). it doesn't specify
all cases in which it might be done.
having said that, i now suspect that sending one byte into a zero-window is not the problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-17 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-15 17:16 erik quanstrom
2008-04-16 13:31 ` Russ Cox
2008-04-16 13:46 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-16 16:52 ` Michaelian Ennis
2008-04-16 18:36 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-16 19:04 ` ron minnich
2008-04-16 19:48 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-16 20:25 ` Tim Wiess
2008-04-16 20:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-16 21:43 ` Taj Khattra
2008-04-16 22:00 ` John Barham
2008-04-16 22:20 ` C H Forsyth
2008-04-16 23:26 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-17 0:04 ` Charles Forsyth [this message]
2008-04-17 8:18 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 18:41 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-17 19:29 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-17 20:59 ` Tim Wiess
2008-04-17 21:19 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 21:23 ` Tim Wiess
2008-04-17 21:56 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 22:06 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 22:43 ` Tim Wiess
2008-04-17 23:02 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 23:09 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 14:56 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-21 15:24 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 19:37 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-21 20:20 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 19:28 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-21 20:19 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 21:06 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-21 21:24 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 21:40 ` Wes Kussmaul
2008-04-21 21:45 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-21 22:04 ` Wes Kussmaul
2008-04-21 21:57 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 22:07 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-21 23:12 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 20:19 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-21 21:49 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-21 22:42 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-17 21:42 ` Bakul Shah
2008-04-17 21:49 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 21:49 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-17 22:15 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 22:19 ` erik quanstrom
2008-04-17 22:48 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 22:55 ` Tim Wiess
2008-04-17 23:08 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-04-17 22:14 ` Bakul Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7d0d774319d70a675979c95dd7c9948@terzarima.net \
--to=forsyth@terzarima.net \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).