From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 01:37:57 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] dual boot Topicbox-Message-UUID: f0ff0808-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Yes, I typed them by hand. Sorry about the error. > > >> panic: kernel fault: no user process pc=0xf0162415 addr=0x000000a8 > >> panic: kernel fault: no user process pc=0xf0162415 addr=0x000000a8 > > > > there is a new TEST image @ http://ftp.9atom.org/other/+usbinstamd64.bz2 > > i have not had a chance to try it myself, but the crash seems obvious enough. > > Thanks. I just tried it and indeed, with the pae kernel, it gets me > into the installer. At some point, I mistakenly selected ("arches to > install" as amd64, well I really wanted to install amd64 but perhaps > the kernel has not been rebuilt for amd64 I guess. > > Now, it proceeds to "build full set of amd64 executables?" which I > selected "yes". I then get a build error: > > 8c -FTVw s_tolower.c > s_rdinstack.c:13 not a function > s_rdinstack.c:13 syntax error, last name: Sinstack > mk: 8c -FTVw s_rdinstack.c : exit status=rc 594: 8c 604: error > mk: date for (i ... : exit status=rc 509: rc 563: mk 565: error > halt system? (yes, no, skip)[no default] oops. sorry. my fault. fixed. > I am going to try installing a 386 system instead (after sending out > this email). > > Also the amd64 kernel still didn't boot. When I selected amd64 > (selection 0), it just printed something that I couldn't read and > rebooted the system. if this is an amd (not intel) system, i may have applied a band-aid for this. > Very eager to try these out. If you have any new builds and want to > test them out (and can bear the time zone difference -- I am in > GMT+5.30), I will be glad to test them out. everything is ready to try in http://ftp.9atom.org/other/+usbinstamd64.bz2 this is the test image. - erik