From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:39:22 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <d7ddb4f8df2af8cb938058b4037f6d83@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <E2D917F2-9550-4D96-97EB-5CDB726D1F9E@fb.com>
References: <EC073287-823A-4F0C-ACFD-2831DE775D53@fb.com>
	<1AE8E693-C840-4E40-BB19-6DF52A98E578@fb.com>
	<CAOw7k5iqEseXUW18L8Ww6E5xUgRdvQTSjB5pvCEUmaTWMSdtvQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<77de0edfefe533821fb5106a4d24052b@mikro.quanstro.net>
	<E2D917F2-9550-4D96-97EB-5CDB726D1F9E@fb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in procwired() for x86 scheduler?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fcd6738c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Jun 23 12:22:23 EDT 2014, pad@fb.com wrote:
> Yes I agree, it's better that way. Is there a list somewhere on the web with all
> those 9atom patches?
>

9fs atom

then look in /n/atom/patch, or /n/atom/patch/applied, or /n/atom/patch/applied$year.

- erik

ps.

for 9fs ....

case atom
	srv -n -q tcp!atom.9atom.org atom &&
		mount $nflag /srv/atom /n/atom atom