From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:25:32 -0400 From: "Robert Sherwood" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Status of SBPro support under 4th Edition In-Reply-To: <0a2adc2b5029c4fc51260b0701cb3d99@hamnavoe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_31718_11847339.1154528732413" References: <1154457548.358932.193320@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <0a2adc2b5029c4fc51260b0701cb3d99@hamnavoe.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 95417aa2-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 ------=_Part_31718_11847339.1154528732413 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Would it be possible to send me the old patch? Are there legal issues preventing it from being included in the base distribution? Rob On 8/2/06, Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com> wrote: > > I have a sbpro-compatible devaudio.c from 2001, but it would need some > changes to fit the 4th edition kernel. I can't remember whether it > was ever tested with an actual SoundBlaster=99 device or only something > which claimed to emulate it. > > The driver in the standard distribution only works for sb16. > > ------=_Part_31718_11847339.1154528732413 Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Would it be possible to send me the old patch?

Are there legal issue= s preventing it from being included in the base distribution?

Rob
On 8/2/06, Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe= .com> wrote:
I have a sbpro-compatible devaudio.c from 2001, but it would need some
c= hanges to fit the 4th edition kernel.  I can't remember whether i= t
was ever tested with an actual SoundBlaster=99 device or only somethin= g
which claimed to emulate it.

The driver in the standard distribution only works for sb16.

------=_Part_31718_11847339.1154528732413--