From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d99f5e1ac63934b6ac74f4a2c680369f@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:39:28 +0000
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Ruby port
In-Reply-To: <13426df10711121101p7f1677a2qcd4dc4f18222117d@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f4122008-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Fact is gcc is a de-facto standard

I'm still trying to understand exactly what you mean by this.

There was talk at one time about a gcc to kenc
preprocessor, this wouldn't solve the C++ problem
but would such a thing be worth attempting?

Have the c99 additions to kenc made such a
translator irrelevnt?

Is the "problem" more the lack of g++ and perhaps
glibc than the gcc C compiler itself or am I
missing somthing.

I'm not trolling, I want to know.

-Steve