From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d9b52783d75c08696b46a6757b9d8fe8@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] browse /sys/src
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 00:49:12 -0800
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <2aab0c267882f16e9ce77d5b9ff0f5a8@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 35d2f814-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> We, academic community is 'open', anyone can get the resources
> we developed.   However, if you want to enter the community,
> you have to be evaluated before.   In this sense, academic community
> is not completely 'open'.   However, we don't believe it's not open.
> I'd like the Plan 9 community is as such.

I don't.

BTW, Plan9 is the most practical system I have. I can access all my data
all the time from anywhere.  It's secure, reliable and resilient. It's wrong
to reinforce the impression that Plan9 is some academic exercise.